NORTH YORKSHIRE COUNCIL
AUDIT COMMITTEE
16 March 2026
RISK MANAGEMENT – PROGRESS REPORT
Report of the Corporate Director – Resources
|
1.0 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
1.1 To receive details of the Corporate Risk Register for the Council and the links between Directorate Risk Registers and the Corporate Risk Register.
1.2 To receive details of the outcome of the audit of risk management that took place in 2025. .
|
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 According to the Terms of Reference of the Audit Committee, its role in risk management is:
(i) to assess the effectiveness of the Council’s risk management arrangements and
(ii) to review progress on the implementation of risk management throughout the Council.
2.2 Regular reports to this Committee therefore cover the implementation of the Policy as well as other related risk management matters in order to fulfill this role.
3.0 CORPORATE RISK REGISTER
3.1 The Corporate Risk Register (CRR) has been fully revised this year by the Chief Executive and Management Board in February 2026. An interim review is scheduled to be carried out in July 2026. The register is the culmination of the identification of significant risks that are identified at Directorate and Service levels.
3.2 The Register attached at Appendix A reflects the most significant risks presently facing the Council. The development of the register has involved reviewing existing risks, the risk controls, risk reductions and risk rankings that had been identified, and making amendments to those risks where necessary.
3.3 To help Members interpret Appendix A
Ø Risks are identified by Management Board during a prep meeting and further discussion
Ø Each risk has then to be ranked based on the following:
Ø existing risk controls in place
Ø probability of the risk occurring (based on existing controls)
Ø impact of the risk occurring (based on existing controls)
Ø further risk reduction actions which may reduce current probability or impact
Ø The Council uses a 5x5 risk assessment ranging from very low to very high in terms of both likelihood and impact. Once the likelihood and impact for a risk have been assessed, the risk scoring is calculated. The following table shows the scoring, assessment and suggested required actions:
|
Colour |
Score |
Assessment |
Required Action |
|
|
1 - 2 |
Very Low (tolerate) |
Risk should not appear in risk register. |
|
|
3 - 4 |
Low (tolerate) |
Regular monitoring, action plan not essential, acceptable just to maintain current controls. |
|
|
5 - 9 |
Medium (treat) |
Frequent monitoring, action plan required. |
|
|
10-12 |
Medium High (treat) |
Frequent monitoring, action plan required to prevent from becoming a red risk. |
|
|
15 - 16 |
High (treat) |
Constant monitoring, action plan required and escalation to next level for consideration / inclusion. |
|
|
20 - 25 |
Very High (treat / terminate) |
Constant monitoring, action plan required and escalation to next level with request for inclusion. Consider terminating activity (if an option) where score cannot be reduced by risk mitigation. |
3.4 The changes to the Register since the last report to this Committee on risk management are as follows:
New or Significantly Changed risks
· Children’s care market. Elements of this issue were previously included within the Major Failure in the Care Markets risk, but ongoing pressures mean it is now being treated as a distinct risk in its own right.
Risks with an improved ranking since the last review
· SEND High Need Budget – whilst this risk remains in the very high category, its risk score has been reduced from 25 to 20. The risk is due to be further reviewed in April by the CYPS Directorate including consideration of the impact of the Schools White Paper.
Risks with an worsening ranking since the last review
· Information Governance and Cyber Security – this risk has returned to red (high) from amber (medium–high) following an increase in attempted cyber‑attacks on the corporate network.
All other risks have unchanged rankings (as shown on the summary in the left hand column of Appendix A).
4.0 LINKS BETWEEN CORPORATE AND DIRECTORATE RISK REGISTERS
4.1 The Corporate Risk Register is the culmination of the identification of key significant risks that are identified at Directorate and Service levels. For information and out of interest, an exercise has been carried out to identify the links between Directorate Risk Registers and the Corporate Risk Register. Please find attached a diagram showing these links at Appendix B.
5.0 ADDITIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY
5.1 As well as the updates of Corporate, Directorate and Service risk registers, additional support is provided to facilitate workshops or review existing risk work for specific areas of activity in the Council. Currently, these include the Levelling Up Fund project at Catterick Garrison, Town Investment Plans, Pride in Place Programme, and the development of Care Hubs in Health and Adult Services. The offer of risk management support for such additional activities is available to all areas of the Council.
6.0 AUDIT OF RISK MANAGEMENT
6.1 In April 2025, an audit of Risk Management within the Council was carried out by Veritau. The purpose of the audit was to provide assurance to management that procedures and controls within the system ensured that:
· Arrangements are in place for identifying, managing and reporting risks, in line with corporate requirements.
· Staff involved in risk management are aware of, and comply with, their responsibilities.
· Actions to reduce and mitigate risks are clearly assigned to responsible officers and progress is monitored.
The audit included a review of what evidence there was of challenge during the periodic review of risk registers, as well as the rationale behind any score changes.
6.2 The outcome of the audit was an overall opinion of Substantial Assurance. One item raised during the audit was ensuring there is sufficient information for Members on risk management, it was agreed that an overview would be developed for inclusion in Member Induction that is being prepared for the May 2027 Council elections. This overview is attached as Appendix C.
|
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
That the Committee:
(i) Notes the updated Corporate Risk Register (Appendix A) and the links between Directorate Risk Registers and the Corporate Risk Register (Appendix B) (ii) Notes the positive outcome of the audit of risk management and the overview of risk management for members (Appendix C)
|
GARY FIELDING
Corporate Director – Resources
County Hall, Northallerton
March 2026
Author of report: Chris Clark, Risk Manager
Tel 01609 534508
|
Risk Trend |
Risk |
Description |
Risk Owner |
Risk Manager |
Curr Prob |
Curr Imp |
Current Risk Score |
Current Category |
Targ Prob |
Targ Imp |
Target Risk Score |
Target Category |
FB Plan? |
|
new |
CRR_19 Children's care market |
Insufficient provision for children and young people that results in inappropriate and high cost external settings and/or delivers poor value for money |
Chief Exec |
CD CYPS |
VH |
VH |
25 |
Very High |
H |
VH |
20 |
Very High |
|
|
|
CRR_15 Major Schemes and Contracts |
Failure to deliver the programme of major transport, regeneration and coastal engineering schemes resulting in impact on the council’s growth plan, negative impact on national and regional partner relations, increased coastal erosion and loss of coastal assets. |
Chief Exec |
CD ComDev; CD ENV |
VH |
VH |
25 |
Very High |
M |
H |
12 |
Medium High |
|
|
|
CRR_16 SEND High Need Budget |
Risk of further increased pressure on the budget given the current legislative framework, increased demand for specialist provision up to age 25 and budget reduction pressure resulting in negative impact on DSG, poor service performance and criticism. |
CD CYPS |
CYPS AD Ed & Incl |
VH |
H |
20 |
Very High |
VH |
H |
20 |
Very High |
|
|
|
CRR_17 Funding Challenges |
Growing financial pressures arising from increased service demand along with inadequate funding available to the Council to discharge its statutory responsibilities and to meet public expectation for the medium term resulting in legal challenge, unbalanced budget and public dissatisfaction. |
Chief Exec |
CD RES |
H |
H |
16 |
High |
H |
H |
16 |
High |
|
|
|
CRR_2 Major Failure due to Quality and/or Economic Issues in the Care Markets and Workforce Pressures |
Major disruption in care markets results in being unable to meet the needs of people who use services. This could be caused by economic performance or resource capabilities including recruitment and retention. The impact could include loss of trust in the Care Market, increased budgetary implications and issues of service user safety. |
Chief Exec |
CD HAS |
H |
H |
16 |
High |
H |
H |
16 |
High |
|
|
|
CRR_11 Housing Regulation Compliance |
Failure to comply with housing legislation including the Social Housing (Regulation) Act and achieve a satisfactory grade with the Regulator of Social Housing, resulting in injury or ill health of tenants, prosecution with subsequent financial penalty, reputational damage to the council and loss of control of the service. |
CD ComDev |
ComDev AD Hou |
H |
H |
16 |
High |
M |
H |
12 |
Medium High |
|
|
|
CRR_13 Transformation Portfolio |
Failure to deliver a coherent Council transformation portfolio which supports achievement of Council Plan ambitions, movement to the target operating model and savings requirements resulting in not delivering on MTFS ambitions, missed opportunities to transform and improve service delivery for residents and lack of central oversight and coordination leading to poorer decision making |
Chief Exec |
CD RES |
H |
H |
16 |
High |
M |
H |
12 |
Medium High |
|
|
|
CRR_4 Information Governance and Cyber Security |
Ineffective information governance and cyber security arrangements lead to unacceptable levels of unauthorised disclosure of personal and sensitive data, poor quality or delayed responses to FoI requests, and inability to locate key data upon which the Council relies resulting in loss of reputation, poor decision making, fine, etc (including Brierley Group companies) Failure to put in place the appropriate cyber security arrangements could potentially lead to breach, loss of data, loss of systems, loss of reputation and inability to operate effectively and discharge our responsibilities |
Chief Exec |
CD RES |
H |
H |
16 |
High |
M |
H |
12 |
Medium High |
|
|
|
CRR_12 Climate Change |
Failure to deliver the Council’s aspirations for carbon neutrality of its own operations by 2030, carbon neutrality of the region by 2034 and a carbon negative region by 2040, and also ensure that appropriate mitigations and adaptations are progressed, failure would result in unmet public expectation and missed opportunities for external funding |
CD ENV |
ENV AD E&T |
H |
M |
12 |
Medium High |
H |
M |
12 |
Medium High |
|
|
|
CRR_3 Recruitment, Retention and Resources |
Failure to recruit and retain appropriately skilled staff and have sufficient resources resulting in inability to deliver services, key projects and the desired organisational transformation also increased staff workload, decreased morale and impact on staff wellbeing. |
Chief Exec |
ACE HR&BS |
M |
H |
12 |
Medium High |
M |
M |
9 |
Medium |
|
|
|
CRR_8 Major Incidents |
Failure to plan, respond to and recover effectively from major incidents in the community resulting in risk to life and limb, impact on statutory responsibilities, impact on financial stability and reputation |
Chief Exec |
Chief Exec |
L |
H |
8 |
Medium |
L |
H |
8 |
Medium |
|
|
Risk Trend Key |
|
|
Symbol |
Meaning |
|
|
Risk ranking has worsened since the last review. |
|
|
Risk ranking is the same as at last review. |
|
|
Risk ranking has improved since the last review. |
|
new |
Risk is new or has been significantly altered since the last review. |
|
|
||||||||||
|
Ref. |
CRR_19 |
Title |
Children's care market |
Risk Owner |
Chief Exec |
Risk Manager |
CD CYPS |
|
||
|
Risk Description |
Insufficient provision for children and young people that results in inappropriate and high cost external settings and/or delivers poor value for money |
Risk Group |
Financial |
Linked Risk(s) |
CYP_3; YCF_2 |
|
||||
|
Phase 2 - Current Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Control Measures |
|
|||||||||
|
Best practice and scrutiny forum monitoring of external placements; Young people’s accommodation strategy; Financial scrutiny and budget monitoring; enhanced CYPLT scrutiny; monitoring of permanency planning by the IRO service; maximise use of adoption and SGO; foster carer recruitment campaign; independent identification of foster carer training needs; commissioning strategy; F&F policy embedded; Permanence Strategy; Adoption and Fostering Strategy; unaccompanied asylum seekers pathway reviewed, procedures in place including agreed Home Office funding; commissioning and contract teams processes reviewed; network meetings always take place prior to any children in care admissions; worked with YJS to review the partnership decision making arrangements to reduce the likelihood of high cost secure and remand cases; Breakthrough Plan identifying areas of focus |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Probability |
VH |
Current Impact |
VH |
Current Risk Score |
25 |
Current Risk Category |
Very High |
|
||
|
Phase 3 - Risk Mitigation Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Reduction Action |
Action Manager |
Due Date and status |
Date Completed |
|
||||||
|
RR_CRR_55 |
Carry out focussed review in order to frame how the service will monitor activity and reporting to CYPLT and the deep dives |
CD CYPS |
30-Apr-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_56 |
Carry out quarterly deep dives with Chief Exec, CD RES, CD CYPS et al to ensure common understanding of service demand, financial pressures and resulting action plans (action by date is for 1st meeting, will then be ongoing) |
CD CYPS |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_57 |
Produce and consider invest to save opportunities that add quality and good value for money to meet placement needs |
CD CYPS; CD RES |
30-Jun-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_58 |
Consider areas of priority alongside expectations relating to OFSTED, with a clear view and plan of the way forward to reduce the number of inappropriate provisions |
CD CYPS |
30-Jun-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_60 |
Develop compliant routes to market for procurement of child places |
CD CYPS |
31-Dec-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_61 |
Obtain commitment from cross directorate colleagues (housing, property, legal) to consider NYC approach to increase in-house provision |
CD ComDev; CD CYPS |
31-Jan-2027 |
|
|
|
||||
|
Phase 4 - Target Risk Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Target Probability |
H |
Target Impact |
VH |
Target Risk Score |
20 |
Target Risk Category |
Very High |
|
||
|
Phase 5 - Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Additional budget and joint discussions with partners regarding collective response |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Phase 1 - Identification |
|
|||||||||
|
Ref. |
CRR_15 |
Title |
Major Schemes and Contracts |
Risk Owner |
Chief Exec |
Risk Manager |
CD ComDev; CD ENV |
|
||
|
Risk Description |
Failure to deliver the programme of major transport, regeneration and coastal engineering schemes resulting in impact on the council’s growth plan, negative impact on national and regional partner relations, increased coastal erosion and loss of coastal assets. |
Risk Group |
Infrastructure |
Linked Risk(s) |
CDE_11; EHT_5; ENV_8; ERG_15; ERG_17 |
|
||||
|
Phase 2 - Current Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Control Measures |
|
|||||||||
|
Programme in place for delivery of NYC Council promoted schemes; support being provided to the third party scheme promoters; risk analysis for each scheme undertaken; effective engagement with nominated H&T rep(s)and NYC in delivery of SEP funded schemes; necessary local contributions secured for the schemes in the LEP programme that are being delivered (August 2021); detailed list of coastal plans and schemes; shoreline management plan (with discrete coastal strategies for specific areas); LEVI delivery team in place; budgets in place; maximise grants available; budget monitoring; project and budget managers in place; grant funding for some projects in place; Capital Programme Plan; Capital Boards in place such as Housing and Regeneration including specific project and programme boards; |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Probability |
VH |
Current Impact |
VH |
Current Risk Score |
25 |
Current Risk Category |
Very High |
|
||
|
Phase 3 - Risk Mitigation Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Reduction Action |
Action Manager |
Due Date and status |
Date Completed |
|
||||||
|
RR_CDE_26 |
Ensure appropriate plans for projects are developed and agreed - ongoing |
ComDev DMT |
31-Oct-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CDE_27 |
Continue budget and progress monitoring of all Schemes including reporting and escalating through Corporate Boards - ongoing |
ComDev DMT |
31-Oct-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CDE_51 |
Work with YNYCA and other stakeholders on future capital regeneration related opportunities |
ComDev AD PSG; RES AD (PF) |
31-Oct-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_50 |
Review corporate approach to the governance and delivery of key capital projects |
CD RES |
31-Mar-2027 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_59 |
Review arrangements to support effective contract management across the council |
CD RES |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_EHT_102 |
Develop on street EV charging strategy and technical solution; strategy and project boards in place, Charge Point Operator (CPO) partner appointed |
ENV E&T HoS&E |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_EHT_103 |
Ongoing management of the Kex Gill project in live delivery and maintain progress on site dealing with technical and financial challenges, progress updates to be provided throughout the works via the agreed governance arrangements and use of the central portal |
ENV H&I HoNS |
30-Jun-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_EHT_108 |
Continue to monitor and manage risks around harbours, including implementation of the approved list of harbour infrastructure projects |
ENV R&H HoH&CI |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_EHT_131 |
Ongoing monitoring of Catterick Garrison construction contract; entry complete, works are ongoing |
ENV H&I HoNS |
31-Oct-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_EHT_132 |
Ongoing monitoring of Jackson's Lane; developing a tender contract for a consultant to enable a Design and Build document to be created |
ENV H&I HoNS |
30-Apr-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_EHT_20 |
Continue to engage with the wider strategic partnership and support them to manage risks associated with specific scheme programmes (ongoing) |
CD ENV |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_EHT_21 |
Continue to ensure sufficient resources to effectively deliver schemes (ongoing) |
ENV AD H&I |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_EHT_23 |
Continue to work closely with APS (and where appropriate, WSP) to ensure that resources match the programme of transport scheme requirements (ongoing) |
ENV AD H&I |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_EHT_24 |
Understand pipeline opportunities medium to long term in order to maximise LG changes in respect of Devolution and combined authority status |
ENV AD H&I |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ERG_49 |
Implement this year’s Environment Agency approved coastal programme (permission to apply for grant going for Exec approval) |
ENV R&H HoH&CI |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ETR_41 |
Develop long term strategy for harbours (includes infrastructure and economic aspects); draft being consulted on internally, will then go for public consultation; internal is complete, external consultation will start Jan 26 incl TEE&E O&SC |
ENV R&H HoH&CI |
31-Mar-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
Phase 4 - Target Risk Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Target Probability |
M |
Target Impact |
H |
Target Risk Score |
12 |
Target Risk Category |
Medium High |
|
||
|
Phase 5 - Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Work with partners on collaborative approach to ensure risk is captured at an early stage and responsibilities are understood |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Phase 1 - Identification |
|
|||||||||
|
Ref. |
CRR_16 |
Title |
SEND High Need Budget |
Risk Owner |
CD CYPS |
Risk Manager |
CYPS AD Ed & Incl |
|
||
|
Risk Description |
Risk of further increased pressure on the budget given the current legislative framework, increased demand for specialist provision up to age 25 and budget reduction pressure resulting in negative impact on DSG, poor service performance and criticism. |
Risk Group |
Financial |
Linked Risk(s) |
CYP_2; YIN_2 |
|
||||
|
Phase 2 - Current Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Control Measures |
|
|||||||||
|
Experienced team and leaders; awareness of Schools Forum; robust data available; management of out-of-authority placements spend; implementing Personal Learning Pathways; Schools Forum approved funding framework; FE network; central contracting and commissioning service; local transition groups in place; budget reviewed incl. roles and responsibilities; revised Resource Allocation System weightings; extra actions identified outside of the plan (eg. profile raising with schools and settings, buffering the spend across the year, reprofiling PRS and EMS); use of top up funding for children with SEN support to reduce need for stat assmnt request; Independent review of decision making carried out; new funding model for the PRS embedded and reviewed; Capital programme to increase special school capacity |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Probability |
VH |
Current Impact |
H |
Current Risk Score |
20 |
Current Risk Category |
Very High |
|
||
|
Phase 3 - Risk Mitigation Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Reduction Action |
Action Manager |
Due Date and status |
Date Completed |
|
||||||
|
RR_CYP_10 |
Carry out review of sufficiency in services for provision of SEND including development of capital programme; work will continue on the efficiency aspects |
CYPS AD Ed & Incl |
30-Apr-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CYP_100 |
Continue to monitor the proposed changes to SEND in the expected 2026 White Paper and understand their impact; including advocating for a fair funding formula |
CYPS AD Ed & Incl; RES AD (HE) |
31-Mar-2027 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CYP_11 |
Ensure that service dashboards reflect the criteria for each of the key inspection areas and are monitored on a regular basis |
all CYPS ADs |
30-Apr-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CYP_12 |
Ensure pre inspection readiness within CYPS for the inspections of LA services, and for schools within the inspection window by continual monitoring of performance and identifying areas for further improvement by assessing their impact (ongoing); dashboards will help improve this area; responding to OFSTED findings through review of local area plans |
all CYPS ADs; RES AD (HE) |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CYP_2 |
Continue to work towards the Strategic Plan aims of early identification of children with SEN and provision of timely support and services (included those that are jointly commissioned) to meet that need thereby reducing the requirement for more costly interventions later; this will be an element of the High Needs Block strand under the transformation agenda; also published local area strategy which includes the early identification work; |
CYPS AD Ed & Incl; CYPS Ed & Incl HoSEND |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CYP_4 |
Work to maintain contributions from HAS and Health on a case by case basis as part of the new transitions process; good case by case work being carried out; further work being carried out to develop an agreed standard tool |
CYPS AD Ed & Incl |
30-Apr-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CYP_5 |
Complete the work around quality assurance and contract management for out of county placements and then rolling out and embedding; included within transformation work |
CYPS AD Ed & Incl |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CYP_6 |
Continue to progress the good work with partners to build choice at post 16 and post 19; progress made but ongoing work continues; review carried out with Adult learning, further work to do with external partners |
CYPS AD Ed & Incl |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CYP_8 |
Embed and review the targeted mainstream provision that replace the EMS model; seventeen in place, working on further provision |
CYPS AD Ed & Incl |
31-Aug-2027 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CYP_90 |
Deliver the High Needs and SEN Programme of transformation (eg. Digital EHCP, SEND Capital Programme, Inclusion Hub remodelling and better data management) savings to achieve financial sustainability |
CYPS AD C&F; CYPS AD Ed & Incl |
30-Apr-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_YIN_64 |
Implement better use of systems and data including, establishing data sharing agreements and obtaining SEN partnership agreement on key data and data sets |
CYPS AD Ed & Incl |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
Phase 4 - Target Risk Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Target Probability |
VH |
Target Impact |
H |
Target Risk Score |
20 |
Target Risk Category |
Very High |
|
||
|
Phase 5 - Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Redirection of resources from areas that have achieved savings |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Phase 1 - Identification |
|
|||||||||
|
Ref. |
CRR_17 |
Title |
Funding Challenges |
Risk Owner |
Chief Exec |
Risk Manager |
CD RES |
|
||
|
Risk Description |
Growing financial pressures arising from increased service demand along with inadequate funding available to the Council to discharge its statutory responsibilities and to meet public expectation for the medium term resulting in legal challenge, unbalanced budget and public dissatisfaction. |
Risk Group |
Financial |
Linked Risk(s) |
RES_3 |
|
||||
|
Phase 2 - Current Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Control Measures |
|
|||||||||
|
Delivery of a sustainable budget supported by a transformation/savings programme alongside budget consolidation, and monitoring/reporting on a quarterly basis; For HAS, weekly budget scrutiny meetings are taking place in the Directorate to monitor financial pressures, including monitoring of care market, provider sustainability and impact of hospital discharge; an ASC Budget Recovery Plan is in place; sub group of Schools Forum to implement high needs strategic plan;; regular meetings and action plan for SEND in place; proposals for savings and growth have been built into the budget; robust programme for high needs/SEN to identify cost reduction measures developed; challenge and intervention framework implemented to assist/instruct schools to take measures to address their financial position; finance staff deployed into schools with the biggest financial challenges to ensure schools balance their budget; finance resources targeted at areas of highest risk.; discussions at Management Team level regarding supplier resilience with a view to targeted proactive interventions into the market; Robust financial management arrangements in place through delivery of significant capital projects; Grant funding actively pursued. |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Probability |
H |
Current Impact |
H |
Current Risk Score |
16 |
Current Risk Category |
High |
|
||
|
Phase 3 - Risk Mitigation Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Reduction Action |
Action Manager |
Due Date and status |
Date Completed |
|
||||||
|
RR_CRR_42 |
Develop longer term strategies for investment and disposal relating to capital, regeneration, and building maintenance backlogs |
CD RES |
31-Jan-2027 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_44 |
Constantly review budget and MTFS in year and as part of the annual exercise |
CD RES |
31-Jan-2027 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_46 |
Identify and advocate on funding with Combined Authority and other agencies |
CD RES |
31-Jan-2027 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_47 |
Carry out deep dives on areas of financial concern with primary focus on C&F, SEND and Adult Social Care |
CD RES |
31-Jan-2027 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_14 |
Continue to lobby DHSC, DfE, ESFA, MPs, DLUHC and HMT on a number of issues such as school and social care funding – both directly and through f40, MPs, professional societies and work with the NHS to share risks where possible and ensure correct level of Health funding contributes to costs |
RES AD (AH); RES AD (HE) |
31-Dec-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_16 |
Implement and monitor a programme of works for high needs/SEN and continue to engage with the DfE’s Delivering Better Value in SEND programme to identify cost mitigation measures (ongoing) - see CRR_16 |
RES AD (HE) |
31-Dec-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_17 |
Implement agreed actions in relation to Social Care Market pressures including care and support delivery hubs |
RES AD (AH) |
31-Dec-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_67 |
Implement the new integrated service planning approach which includes service savings opportunities, requests for transformation funding alongside service improvements |
RES AD (ALL) |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_70 |
Actively monitor and manage Finances of large Capital projects and include appropriate risk and contingency schemes (ongoing) - see CRR_15 |
RES AD (ALL) |
31-Dec-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_71 |
Develop robust financial business cases for investments and invest to save opportunities (ongoing) |
RES AD (ALL) |
31-Dec-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
Phase 4 - Target Risk Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Target Probability |
H |
Target Impact |
H |
Target Risk Score |
16 |
Target Risk Category |
High |
|
||
|
Phase 5 - Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Review deployment of Resources in light of present and emerging financial pressures |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Phase 1 - Identification |
|
|||||||||
|
Ref. |
CRR_2 |
Title |
Major Failure due to Quality and/or Economic Issues in the Care Markets and Workforce Pressures |
Risk Owner |
Chief Exec |
Risk Manager |
CD HAS |
|
||
|
Risk Description |
Major disruption in care markets results in being unable to meet the needs of people who use services. This could be caused by economic performance or resource capabilities including recruitment and retention. The impact could include loss of trust in the Care Market, increased budgetary implications and issues of service user safety. |
Risk Group |
Legislative |
Linked Risk(s) |
HAS_2; HSC_3 |
|
||||
|
Phase 2 - Current Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Control Measures |
|
|||||||||
|
Regular review and monitoring of contracts in addition to close working relationship with corporate procurement colleagues; Integrated Quality Improvement Team now embedded into the service and continuing to work well; contract management team established; Market position statement created as an online tool to support commissioning and interventions into the market; quality pathway launched with enhanced market surveillance to ensure market oversight in line with The Care Act; Sustainability process in place to enable financial assistance to the market where value for money and strategic need can be evidenced; Service Development function now created linked to locality working to identify market issues at an early stage and appropriate market support strategies are created; Ongoing rolling programme of audits by Veritau of individual suppliers; Initial business case approved for Intervention into Harrogate market; Health brokerage pilots; Continued engagement with CQC locally and Nationally; Make Care Matter; IBCF monies used for Recruitment Hub, Learning4Care and rural dom care pilot; Enhanced care homes services in place continue to provide wrap around support to the market; worked with ICG to ensure provider BCPs in place and tested; Use of Quality Assessment Tool; quality mgt and contract mgt separated; Quality Pathway; quality policies revised |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Probability |
H |
Current Impact |
H |
Current Risk Score |
16 |
Current Risk Category |
High |
|
||
|
Phase 3 - Risk Mitigation Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Reduction Action |
Action Manager |
Due Date and status |
Date Completed |
|
||||||
|
RR_HSC_108 |
Continue to implement multi agency approach with ICB on issues with overseas workers; council is a super spoke for international recruitment |
HAS AD ASC (CW) |
30-Jun-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_HSC_11 |
Work at a system level (ICS) with partners to mitigate the impact of workplace shortages; ongoing and linking via ADASS Workforce groups which have a developed workforce plan that aligns with the Skills for Care Workforce Strategy and national/regional work to address the issues |
HAS all ASC ADs ; HAS HoHR |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_HSC_125 |
Understand the potential impact to workforce following changes to immigration rules for social care staff |
HAS AD ASC (CW) |
30-Apr-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_HSC_13 |
Continue to seek opportunities to gain national support for workforce issues in the care system; including improved communication around licensing arrangements; position has improved but work is ongoing |
CD HAS; HAS all ASC ADs |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_HSC_17 |
Continue working with the care market to establish more robust services in NY for those with complex needs linked to improvement priority; plans in place for new approach to commission complex needs care; A specialist care commissioning project has been set up with good engagement from the market, testing of a range of new models of care including enablement, crisis services and specialist dementia and WAA provision are part of these plans. |
HAS AD ASC (CW) |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_HSC_18 |
Continue to engage in ADASS work to manage major problems occurring, such as financial issues in the care provider market and ensure robust contingency planning and to learn lessons from serious case reviews at a national level; more work being done to enhance regional ways of working; this continues with use of national capacity tracker and contingencies in place; ongoing |
HAS AD PSD (AB) |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_HSC_19 |
Continue to work with Veritau on audits of individual suppliers (rolling programme in place of focussed work in particular areas) - ongoing |
HAS AD PSD (AB); HAS ASC HoSC |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_HSC_24 |
Continue to work with market development board to monitor and manage interventions in the care market; key focus is on specialist commissioning as per RR_HSC_17 and on growing homecare in rural areas commencing a pilot in Whitby |
HAS AD PSD (AB) |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_HSC_9 |
Develop a business case for the development of county-wide care and support hubs to help alleviate care home affordability issue; approved by Exec Jan 25; individual business cases and planning for phase 1 of this work is underway incorporating two sites initially |
HAS AD PSD (AB) |
31-Jan-2025 |
|
07-Jan-2025 |
|
||||
|
Phase 4 - Target Risk Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Target Probability |
H |
Target Impact |
H |
Target Risk Score |
16 |
Target Risk Category |
High |
|
||
|
Phase 5 - Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Make people safe, crisis meeting, implement relevant steps, consultation with senior staff and relevant organisations (e.g. Police CQC). Effective communication to relevant parties, utilise established failure plan. |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Phase 1 - Identification |
|
|||||||||
|
Ref. |
CRR_11 |
Title |
Housing Regulation Compliance |
Risk Owner |
CD ComDev |
Risk Manager |
ComDev AD Hou |
|
||
|
Risk Description |
Failure to comply with housing legislation including the Social Housing (Regulation) Act and achieve a satisfactory grade with the Regulator of Social Housing, resulting in injury or ill health of tenants, prosecution with subsequent financial penalty, reputational damage to the council and loss of control of the service. |
Risk Group |
Legislative |
Linked Risk(s) |
CDE_10; CHO_8 |
|
||||
|
Phase 2 - Current Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Control Measures |
|
|||||||||
|
Improvement plan and strategy; new governance arrangements through housing improvement board; O&S committee; new structure for tenant engagement; new suite of performance indicators; ongoing customer satisfaction arrangements through TSMs; regular engagement with the social housing regulator; critical friend challenge from Savilles; |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Probability |
H |
Current Impact |
H |
Current Risk Score |
16 |
Current Risk Category |
High |
|
||
|
Phase 3 - Risk Mitigation Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Reduction Action |
Action Manager |
Due Date and status |
Date Completed |
|
||||||
|
RR_CHO_22 |
Ensure we have full understanding of data quality and assurance, in order to meet legal and regulatory requirements; baseline known but further work to establish a sustainable view on data (date is next review) |
ComDev AD Hou |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CHO_29 |
Ensure compliance with the 'big seven' H&S requirements – ongoing |
ComDev AD Hou |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CHO_30 |
Ensure delivery of the stock condition survey programme |
ComDev AD Hou |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CHO_31 |
Ensure there is sufficient resource to address the impact of the improvement plan work, including predicted increases in demand for responsive repairs, demand for responsive surveys in respect of damp and mould and increased complaints - ongoing |
ComDev AD Hou |
31-Jul-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CHO_32 |
Work to ensure we are compliant with the Rent Standard (currently being supported by Veritau) |
ComDev AD Hou |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_52 |
Complete the Housing Regulator improvement plan |
ComDev AD Hou |
31-Aug-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
Phase 4 - Target Risk Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Target Probability |
M |
Target Impact |
H |
Target Risk Score |
12 |
Target Risk Category |
Medium High |
|
||
|
Phase 5 - Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Respond as necessary to any incident, carry out lessons learned review |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Phase 1 - Identification |
|
|||||||||
|
Ref. |
CRR_13 |
Title |
Transformation Portfolio |
Risk Owner |
Chief Exec |
Risk Manager |
CD RES |
|
||
|
Risk Description |
Failure to deliver a coherent Council transformation portfolio which supports achievement of Council Plan ambitions, movement to the target operating model and savings requirements resulting in not delivering on MTFS ambitions, missed opportunities to transform and improve service delivery for residents and lack of central oversight and coordination leading to poorer decision making |
Risk Group |
Strategic |
Linked Risk(s) |
CSD_3; RES_4; RTR_2 |
|
||||
|
Phase 2 - Current Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Control Measures |
|
|||||||||
|
Transformation programme (TP); service planning approach to identify areas of improvement convergence and transformation; review of areas of overspend and actions to mitigate; review (deep dives) into specific high-risk base budgets; delivery of cross cutting programmes to drive a one council approach; Transformation service new structures; broader council governance in development; performance monitoring through mgt board reports; transformation governance to be agreed; NYC2030 Shaping Tomorrow draft strategy; |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Probability |
H |
Current Impact |
H |
Current Risk Score |
16 |
Current Risk Category |
High |
|
||
|
Phase 3 - Risk Mitigation Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Reduction Action |
Action Manager |
Due Date and status |
Date Completed |
|
||||||
|
RR_CRR_38 |
Deliver cross cutting transformation themes in order to further improve effectiveness and deliver savings (eg Customer workstream, The Way We Will Work, Demand Management) |
RES AD Transf |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_40 |
Identify key resource pressure points and solutions to deliver required functionality to deliver the TP including suggested approach to prioritising scarce resource (ongoing) |
RES AD Transf |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_41 |
Monitor delivery of savings proposals and other transformational actions and identify responses to issues as they arise (ongoing) |
CD RES |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_45 |
Provide an effective and efficient customer service across the Council where all staff and services work together to meet the needs of all customers |
CD RES |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_53 |
Ensure delivery of key enabling systems (eg new finance system) |
CD RES |
31-Mar-2027 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CSD_19 |
Ensure an effective technology plan is in place to drive the required system convergence in support of transformation priorities (new programme being developed) |
RES AD Tech |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_103 |
Agree prioritisation of key issues and also communication of those areas deemed non-priority |
CD RES |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_80 |
Obtain Management Board agreement for the prioritised Transformation Portfolio and the additional capacity required to deliver on the priorities |
RES AD Transf |
30-Apr-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RTR_14 |
Further maintain and refine the Target Operating Model and ensure it remains the direction of travel for all services |
All Mgt Board |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RTR_22 |
Complete the maturing and embedding of Transformation structures |
RES AD Transf |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
Phase 4 - Target Risk Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Target Probability |
M |
Target Impact |
H |
Target Risk Score |
12 |
Target Risk Category |
Medium High |
|
||
|
Phase 5 - Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Carry out a full review and ensure an effective revision of the transformation and savings programme plan |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Phase 1 - Identification |
|
|||||||||
|
Ref. |
CRR_4 |
Title |
Information Governance and Cyber Security |
Risk Owner |
Chief Exec |
Risk Manager |
CD RES |
|
||
|
Risk Description |
Ineffective information governance and cyber security arrangements lead to unacceptable levels of unauthorised disclosure of personal and sensitive data, poor quality or delayed responses to FoI requests, and inability to locate key data upon which the Council relies resulting in loss of reputation, poor decision making, fine, etc (including Brierley Group companies) Failure to put in place the appropriate cyber security arrangements could potentially lead to breach, loss of data, loss of systems, loss of reputation and inability to operate effectively and discharge our responsibilities |
Risk Group |
Info Gov |
Linked Risk(s) |
CSD_2; RES_2; RTE_2 |
|
||||
|
Phase 2 - Current Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Control Measures |
|
|||||||||
|
Information Management and Governance Strategy including the
associated Policy and Procedure Framework; CIGG Action Plan; data
breach process; messages from senior management; on-line training;
staff induction; Information Asset Owners identified; information
asset registers regularly updated; Internal Data Governance team
with an identified representative for each Directorate (replacing
DIGCs); Veritau appointed as DPO; posters; intranet information;
regular monitoring of electronic communication by T&C; series
of unannounced security compliance visits by internal audit
Brierley Group companies’ information governance procedures
in place; |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Probability |
H |
Current Impact |
H |
Current Risk Score |
16 |
Current Risk Category |
High |
|
||
|
Phase 3 - Risk Mitigation Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Reduction Action |
Action Manager |
Due Date and status |
Date Completed |
|
||||||
|
RR_CSD_5 |
Continue further improvement of information risk management processes; revised service register in place further work will progress via CIGG |
RES AD Tech |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_5 |
Continue to ensure business continuity plans are reviewed, exercised and kept up to date for Council services and trading companies; currently supporting NYC with any live BC incidents to ensure that service is maintained; technology and RET teams working together to establish interdependencies and priorities |
Loc Eng HoR&E |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_6 |
Create a Data Quality Assurance framework process that provides a centralised record of Information Asset Ownership, data accuracy and data quality review; new data management policy in place, work to do on IAOs and IAR |
RES AD Tech |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_75 |
Monitor the delivery and effectiveness of the Information Management and Governance Strategy, and update if required |
CD RES; Veritau |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_76 |
Ensure that mitigating actions are carried out as a result of lessons learned from data breaches |
RES AD Tech |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_77 |
Deliver ongoing communications and training to raise awareness of Information Governance risks and council policies (ongoing); security awareness programme being developed |
CD RES; Veritau |
31-Jan-2027 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_8 |
Continue to review resourcing to ensure required delivery of Veritau service (ongoing) |
CD RES |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_9 |
Continue a review of IG procedures and providing support to the Brierley Group of Companies; |
CD RES; Veritau |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RES_90 |
Carry out no-notice cyber exercise to test robustness of disaster recovery and business continuity plans |
CD RES |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_RTE_41 |
Carry out full review of information assets and ownership to ensure responsibility is taken where appropriate for all information |
RES AD Tech |
30-Nov-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
Phase 4 - Target Risk Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Target Probability |
M |
Target Impact |
H |
Target Risk Score |
12 |
Target Risk Category |
Medium High |
|
||
|
Phase 5 - Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Review and revise Action Plan and new technology and continue to raise awareness. |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Phase 1 - Identification |
|
|||||||||
|
Ref. |
CRR_12 |
Title |
Climate Change |
Risk Owner |
CD ENV |
Risk Manager |
ENV AD E&T |
|
||
|
Risk Description |
Failure to deliver the Council’s aspirations for carbon neutrality of its own operations by 2030, carbon neutrality of the region by 2034 and a carbon negative region by 2040, and also ensure that appropriate mitigations and adaptations are progressed, failure would result in unmet public expectation and missed opportunities for external funding |
Risk Group |
Environmental |
Linked Risk(s) |
ECC_5; ENV_13 |
|
||||
|
Phase 2 - Current Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Control Measures |
|
|||||||||
|
Leadership commitment; Executive member with portfolio responsibilities; Climate Change Champion post; reports to Scrutiny cttee Corporate Building and Asset energy efficiency schemes; LGA guidance for councillors; Climate Change awareness training programme for officers and members; Carbon Reduction Plans for legacy Councils; Beyond Carbon board and programme management established; climate change impact assessment tool enables decision makers to better understand the impact of the decisions that they are being asked to make; £1m pump-priming fund established in MTFS to support implementation of carbon reduction plan; integrated carbon reduction plan into council plan and KPIs into Q performance reports; agreement of carbon neutral by 2030 aim for council operations; NYC Climate Change Strategy adopted Jul 23; Climate Change Delivery Pathway approved by Exec Aug 24 |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Probability |
H |
Current Impact |
M |
Current Risk Score |
12 |
Current Risk Category |
Medium High |
|
||
|
Phase 3 - Risk Mitigation Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Reduction Action |
Action Manager |
Due Date and status |
Date Completed |
|
||||||
|
RR_ECC_16 |
Continue utilisation of £1m pump-priming fund established in MTFS to support implementation of NYC Climate Change Strategy |
ENV AD E&T |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ECC_17 |
Ongoing review of the effectiveness of the climate change impact assessment tool to reflect new climate change strategy and ensure that it is efficient in enabling decision makers to better understand the impact of the decisions that they are being asked to make, alternative governance opportunities are also being explored to better strengthen climate change impact on decision making |
ENV AD E&T |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ECC_18 |
Work through the detailed property related considerations; proposals to be developed through the property service once fully restructured including a property decarbonisation plan. |
ENV AD E&T; RES CP&P HoPC&FM |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ECC_19 |
Monitor progress on the detailed motor related issues (eg. fleet decarbonisation plan and grey fleet reduction) and raise concerns where appropriate; Fleet are working with Cenex to look at fleet decarbonisation potential, with a report due in September 2025; Cenex report completed |
ENV AD E&T |
30-Jun-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ECC_31 |
Create a North Yorkshire Council Climate Adaptation Plan (alongside the Regional Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment) to support services and residents, communities and businesses to prepare for our climate to change. This will assess our risks and identify options for adaptation; YNYCA lead and work is progressing |
ENV AD E&T |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ECC_32 |
Work with partners, communities, suppliers and businesses to develop climate change awareness, encourage climate responsible choices and implement actions such as scaling up building retrofit projects and increasing low carbon heating, including for NYC’s social housing stock, supported through the climate change business partners |
ENV AD E&T |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ECC_33 |
Work to ensure that the Council's Local Plan and Local Transport Plan (now the responsibility of YNYCA) include appropriate responses to climate change; officers continue to be involved in the relevant service teams |
ENV AD E&T |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ECC_34 |
Investigate how NYC assets such as land and buildings can best be used to generate low carbon energy (including opportunities at the jointly owned assets Energy from Waste (EfW) plant and closed landfill sites) and highlight potential for carbon capture and storage opportunities, funding secured from DESNZ to develop a strategic energy partnership (green finance model - 2yr programme will report on options) in support of this (linked to RR_ECC_18); carbon capture at EfW site explored and deemed technically possibly but not commercially viable |
ENV AD E&T |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ECC_35 |
Measure and report on our emissions and plan how and when we will hit our target using a nationally recognised formula to calculate carbon emissions from delivering the services which are under our direct control. Ongoing work to quantify our carbon footprint and utilise available/limited data sources. Undertaking work to submit to the external carbon reporting framework (CDP) in addition to climate emergency scorecards (annual report received an ‘A’ in 25). Working with Strategy and Policy colleagues to incorporate climate change reporting into future Q reports; project to improve performance mgt around climate change, to better benchmark and track our progress; need Transformation and D&I support to progress |
ENV AD E&T |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ECC_36 |
Embed climate change across the council via production of service and directorate level climate change action plans and ongoing awareness raising with Officers and Members; Directorate action plans developed in collaboration with each directorate, ongoing work to support the delivery of this through climate change business partners; plans have been created and are now in their delivery phases |
ENV AD E&T |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ECC_49 |
Create a NY Council carbon credit / offsetting strategy linked to our defined carbon footprint and trajectory which helps identify options for utilising carbon credits or offsetting future carbon emissions; linked to RR_ECC_35 which will enable a better understanding of the scale |
ENV AD E&T |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ECC_50 |
Continue to work and strengthen our relationship with YNYCA on the York and North Yorkshire Routemap to Carbon Negative, regional decarbonisation projects and future opportunities for net zero funding. |
ENV AD E&T |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ECC_55 |
Continue the work around Supporting Nature to Thrive (3rd pillar of the CC strategy) (see Risk ECC_9) |
ENV AD E&T |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ECC_56 |
Continue to apply for external funding to implement our prepared business cases which deliver the strategy |
ENV AD E&T |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_ENV_42 |
Agree and deliver an annual programme of flood risk management schemes |
ENV AD H&I |
31-May-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
Phase 4 - Target Risk Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Target Probability |
H |
Target Impact |
M |
Target Risk Score |
12 |
Target Risk Category |
Medium High |
|
||
|
Phase 5 - Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Review strategy and implementation methods |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Phase 1 - Identification |
|
|||||||||
|
Ref. |
CRR_3 |
Title |
Recruitment, Retention and Resources |
Risk Owner |
Chief Exec |
Risk Manager |
ACE HR&BS |
|
||
|
Risk Description |
Failure to recruit and retain appropriately skilled staff and have sufficient resources resulting in inability to deliver services, key projects and the desired organisational transformation also increased staff workload, decreased morale and impact on staff wellbeing. |
Risk Group |
Staffing |
Linked Risk(s) |
HHR_8 |
|
||||
|
Phase 2 - Current Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Control Measures |
|
|||||||||
|
Recruitment: flexible
pay arrangements including market supplements, other payments; good
wider benefits package, amended pay structure to take account of
posts and grades with particular recruitment and retention
challenges; recruitment campaigns and advertising; work with
managers to recruit swiftly; social media to promote the
organisation and jobs creating a recognisable and attractive
employer brand; positively promote the Council as an inclusive
employer with good use of diverse images in campaigns to ensure all
applicants feel welcome; |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Probability |
M |
Current Impact |
H |
Current Risk Score |
12 |
Current Risk Category |
Medium High |
|
||
|
Phase 3 - Risk Mitigation Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Reduction Action |
Action Manager |
Due Date and status |
Date Completed |
|
||||||
|
RR_CRR_10 |
Strengthen the focus on recruitment to entry level posts alongside career pathways (apprentices and trainees where recruitment is more successful) |
ACE HR&BS |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_2 |
Ensure opportunities and progression through development are provided to staff through internal career pathways and ‘organisation for life’ approach |
ACE HR&BS |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_3 |
Ensure the organisation designs and provides good work and is a ‘good employer’ through its actions and practice, includes shared commitment, inclusivity and the use of innovative technologies to improve the employment experience; will need to review and strengthen in light of the Employment Rights Bill (ERB) implementation |
ACE HR&BS |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_36 |
Minimise the use of agency workers and external consultants to short term emergency requirements; as a commitment to offering permanent work, building established team/service dynamics and communication of the benefits of working for the organisation (ongoing) |
ACE HR&BS |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_37 |
Continue to utilise a range of contract types to achieve a resilient, agile workforce that meets service demand and proactively manages staffing levels in order to meet fluctuating demand; subject to ERB |
ACE HR&BS |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_4 |
Continue to enable hybrid working to provide flexibility to employees and necessary services and recognise the attraction of this approach in the labour market |
ACE HR&BS |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_48 |
Refocus approach to attendance management by embedding the refreshed policy and guidance, increasing support and training to managers, and monitoring and reporting on outcomes |
ACE HR&BS |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_49 |
Ensure that we embrace assistive technologies with appropriate digital skills, an understanding of the impact on job roles and the required ethical monitoring and safeguards |
ACE HR&BS |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_5 |
Ensure work/life balance is available and attainable to all employees and enable all staff to access Health & Well Being services |
ACE HR&BS |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_6 |
Continue to develop and offer good terms and conditions and an innovative package of voluntary benefits, whilst maintaining our ability to operate in competitive environments |
ACE HR&BS |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_8 |
Continue to deploy a range of tools and resources to recruit to vacancies adapting the recruitment response to the role type. Continued use of creative recruitment campaigns with good use of social media; introducing new recruitment technologies in 2026 |
ACE HR&BS |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_CRR_9 |
Develop manager’s skills for effective and positive staff management including engagement and support in order to assist retention and successful recruitment (ongoing) |
ACE HR&BS |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
Phase 4 - Target Risk Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Target Probability |
M |
Target Impact |
M |
Target Risk Score |
9 |
Target Risk Category |
Medium |
|
||
|
Phase 5 - Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Review and revise resource allocation where possible and consider additional funding and capacity where required |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Phase 1 - Identification |
|
|||||||||
|
Ref. |
CRR_8 |
Title |
Major Incidents |
Risk Owner |
Chief Exec |
Risk Manager |
Chief Exec |
|
||
|
Risk Description |
Failure to plan, respond to and recover effectively from major incidents in the community resulting in risk to life and limb, impact on statutory responsibilities, impact on financial stability and reputation |
Risk Group |
Performance |
Linked Risk(s) |
CSD_7; LEN_2 |
|
||||
|
Phase 2 - Current Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Control Measures |
|
|||||||||
|
NYLRF and RMCI; experience and resources of partners; existing plans incl public health (training and exercises); RET; partnership working with Services; community resilience; silver response in the Council major incident plan tested; approach to BCP refreshed to strengthen service resilience; Resilience Direct portal; regional multi agency pandemic exercise held; effectiveness and robustness of resilience plans relating to the public health and social care of the NY population tested; NYC action plan developed and implemented based on the debrief report recommendations and all multi agency learning (including the flood reporting tool and simplification of information flow); members of national steering group on volunteers; BCP post audit action plan; Multi Agency cyber threat event held; Ready for Anything campaign; provided input to and engaged with national learning and development of best practice following incidents locally, regionally and nationally; use of Office 365 tools to increase engagement and response capability in effective planning and coordination of incidents; increased team to support Covid response and ability to deal with concurrent incidents; LRF workplan through to 2024; partnership work with Directorates, Migration Yorkshire and other partners to support refugee resettlement in the County; Corp Emergency Planning Group with annual workplan; |
|
|||||||||
|
Current Probability |
L |
Current Impact |
H |
Current Risk Score |
8 |
Current Risk Category |
Medium |
|
||
|
Phase 3 - Risk Mitigation Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Reduction Action |
Action Manager |
Due Date and status |
Date Completed |
|
||||||
|
RR_LEN_2 |
Continue to work with new and existing partners in Public Health England, the NHS, the wider North Yorkshire local resilience forum and the new Combined Authority to share the information and messages of reassurance being issued by the lead agencies |
Dir Public Health |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_LEN_3 |
Continue to ensure business continuity plans are reviewed, exercised and kept up to date for Council services and trading companies; currently supporting NYC with any live BC incidents to ensure that service is maintained |
CD RES |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_LEN_37 |
Harmonise processes and associated risk assessments for operational response to incidents to ensure H&S of staff is maintained |
ACE Loc Eng |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_LEN_38 |
Ensure that NYC risks consider the contents of the National Security Risk Assessment and Community Risk Register |
ACE Loc Eng |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_LEN_6 |
Continue to ensure effective and efficient processes are embedded amongst all partners to prioritise work streams (incl. plans, training and exercises) (ongoing) |
ACE Loc Eng |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
RR_LEN_7 |
Continue to embed the recommendations from incident debriefs within practice through the Corp Emergency Planning Group |
Loc Eng HoR&E |
30-Sep-2026 |
|
|
|
||||
|
Phase 4 - Target Risk Assessment |
|
|||||||||
|
Target Probability |
L |
Target Impact |
H |
Target Risk Score |
8 |
Target Risk Category |
Medium |
|
||
|
Phase 5 - Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Fallback Plan |
|
|||||||||
|
Embedded practice based on Response to Major and Critical Incident protocols |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Risk Reduction Action Status Key |
|
|
Symbol |
Meaning |
|
|
The risk reduction action is overdue for completion or review. |
|
|
The risk reduction action is approaching its expected completion or review date. |
|
|
The risk reduction action is on target. |
|
|
The risk reduction action has been completed. |

Risk Management
Risk management is a key part of the council’s corporate governance arrangements providing assurance to meet the requirements of the Accounts and Audit Regulations 2015; supporting the council’s Annual Governance Statement and ensuring the council understands and manages the risks it faces at strategic and operational levels.
The risk management framework operated by the council includes:-
· Risk registers for all services, directorates and at corporate level
· Risk support to key projects and programmes
· The operation of directorate and corporate risk management and resilience groups attended by officers with risk related specialisms
· Identified risk management champions in each directorate
In practicing effective risk management across North Yorkshire Council, we expect to be able to deliver the following benefits:
· An increased ability to deliver against our objectives and take advantage of opportunities, and to enable innovation
· Better informed decision making
· Improved stakeholder trust and confidence
· Enhanced efficiency as less management time, and fewer council funds, are lost dealing with risk events
· Improved customer service
· Improved health and safety
· An ability to evidence robust corporate governance arrangements and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements
· Being more flexible and responsive to new pressures, and to any changes in the market and community needs
The following shows how risk management is reported through the Council

Further details can be found in the Risk Management Policy here NYC Risk Management Policy or by contacting the Risk Manager, Chris Clark by email chris.clark@northyorks.gov.uk or by telephone on 01609 534508 .